Sunday, 19 May 2013

  • The FAKE Benghazi conspiracy from the whacko far right

    About three hours after the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, came under attack, the Pentagon issued an urgent call for an array of quick-reaction forces, including an elite Special Forces team that was on a training mission in Croatia.

    Gen. Carter Ham, head of Africa Command, seen last year, was in Washington for meetings when the attack took place.

    The team dropped what it was doing and prepared to move to the Sigonella naval air station in Sicily, a short flight from Benghazi and other hot spots in the region. By the time the unit arrived at the base, however, the surviving Americans at the Benghazi mission had been evacuated to Tripoli, and Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were dead.

    The assault, on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, has already exposed shortcomings in the Obama administration’s ability to secure diplomatic missions and act on intelligence warnings. But this previously undisclosed episode, described by several American officials, points to a limitation in the capabilities of the American military command responsible for a large swath of countries swept up in the Arab Spring.

    At the heart of the issue is the Africa Command, established in 2007, well before the Arab Spring uprisings and before an affiliate of Al Qaeda became a major regional threat. It did not have on hand what every other regional combatant command has: its own force able to respond rapidly to emergencies — a Commanders’ In-Extremis Force, or C.I.F.

    To respond to the Benghazi attack, the Africa Command had to borrow the C.I.F. that belongs to the European Command, because its own force is still in training. It also had no AC-130 gunships or armed drones readily available.

    As officials in the White House and Pentagon scrambled to respond to the torrent ofreports pouring out from Libya — with Mr. Stevens missing and officials worried that he might have been taken hostage — they took the extraordinary step of sending elite Delta Force commandos, with their own helicopters and ground vehicles, from their base at Fort Bragg, N.C., to Sicily. Those troops also arrived too late.

    “The fact of the matter is these forces were not in place until after the attacks were over,” a Pentagon spokesman, George Little, said on Friday, referring to a range of special operations soldiers and other personnel. “We did respond. The secretary ordered forces to move. They simply were not able to arrive in time.”

    An examination of these tumultuous events undercuts the criticism leveled by some Republicans that the Obama administration did not try to respond militarily to the crisis.The attack was not a running eight-hour firefight as some critics have contended, questioning how an adequate response could not be mustered in that time, but rather two relatively short, intense assaults separated by a lull of four hours. But the administration’s response also shows that the forces in the region had not been adequately reconfigured.

    The Africa Command was spun off from the European Command. At the time it was set up, the Pentagon thought it would be devoted mostly to training African troops and building military ties with African nations. Because of African sensitivities about an overt American military presence in the region, the command’s headquarters was established in Stuttgart, Germany.

    While the other regional commands, including the Pacific Command and the Central Command, responsible for the Middle East and South Asia, have their own specialized quick-reaction forces, the Africa Command has had an arrangement to borrow the European Command’s force when needed. The Africa Command has been building its own team from scratch, and its nascent strike force was in the process of being formed in the United States on Sept. 11, a senior military official said.

    “The conversation about getting them closer to Africa has new energy,” the military official said.

    Some Pentagon officials said that it was unrealistic to think a quick-reaction force could have been sent in time even if the African Command had one ready to act on the base in Sicily when the attack unfolded, and asserted that such a small force might not have even been effective or the best means to protect an embassy. But critics say there has been a gap in the command’s quick-reaction capability, which the force would have helped fill.

    A spokesman for the command declined to comment on how its capabilities might be improved.

    The Africa Command is led by Gen. Carter F. Ham, an infantryman who commanded a brigade in Mosul during the Iraq war and took charge of the headquarters last year, just before American, British and French air power helped topple Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya.

    On the day of the attacks on the mission and a nearby annex in Benghazi, General Ham and other commanders were in Washington for a series of long-planned meetings. The Pentagon’s national military command center distributed a report around 4:30 p.m., 50 minutes after the assault started, that there had been violence in Benghazi and that the ambassador could not be located.

    President Obama was informed about the attack at 5 p.m. by his national security adviser, Thomas E. Donilon, at the start of a meeting at the White House with Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Libya was not the only worry. There were also protests at the United States’ embassies in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen.

    In the meeting, Mr. Obama ordered the Pentagon to begin “mobilizing all available military assets to respond to a range of contingencies in Libya and other countries in the region,” said Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the National Security Council.

    But the administration was not well positioned to respond quickly. On the night of the attack, the Pentagon was able to divert an unarmed Predator drone operating 90 miles away to Benghazi, and the C.I.A. later used it to help plan an escape route for the surviving Americans.

    Two military officers working at the embassy in Tripoli volunteered to join C.I.A. reinforcements who arrived in Benghazi early the next morning, just before a series of deadly mortar rounds struck the agency’s annex in Benghazi and killed two C.I.A. security contractors.

    But other military forces were too far away or could not be mobilized in time. The closest AC-130 gunship, a devastating and accurate weapon against insurgents in urban areas, was in Afghanistan, a senior official said.

    There are no armed drones within range of Libya. The closest fly out of Djibouti, in the Horn of Africa, and were not in range of Benghazi. There was no Marine expeditionary unit — a large seaborne force with its own helicopters — in the Mediterranean Sea. American F-16 fighters in Europe were not on alert, and General Ham concluded they would not have been useful in a confused fight in a major Arab city.

    Acting on Mr. Obama’s order, the staff of the Joint Chiefs presented the options. Around 6:30 p.m., oral instructions were given for the units to get ready to deploy and formal deployment orders were issued after 8:30 p.m. The early reports in Washington noted that Ambassador Stevens was missing, and a major worry was that a hostage-rescue mission might be needed.

    The Pentagon sent the Delta Force commandos to the Sigonella base in Sicily, to put them in position to deploy to Libya. Two 50-strong platoons of specially trained Marines, from Rota, Spain, were ordered to get ready to deploy, too.

    Another option approved was to send the European Command’s quick-reaction force, which consists of about four dozen Special Forces soldiers and other specialists. But it was in the middle of a mission in Croatia. Elements of the team began leaving for Sigonella by 9 p.m., and the unit completed its deployment to Sicily shortly after noon the next day, a Pentagon official said. By then the 30 or so surviving Americans, and the bodies of their four colleagues, were in Tripoli.

    With the region still in turmoil, the European Command’s quick-reaction team was sent on to Tunis. One of the Marine platoons was sent to Tripoli to protect the United States Embassy there. The Delta Force commandos, having arrived too late to help, flew back home, Pentagon officials said.

    Now, the administration has quietly begun a major interdepartmental review of security requirements in North Africa and the Middle East, said officials, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity because of continuing investigations.

    Independent military experts say that the fledgling Africa Command’s capabilities need to be strengthened, particularly in light of the array of new threats, from a Qaeda franchise that has seized control of northern Mali to Islamist groups gaining strength in nations like Libya and Tunisia.

    “There will have to be a reassessment of the priorities and resources for Africom, given the responsibilities it has in one of the most volatile regions of the world,” said Jack Keane, the retired general who served as the Army vice chief of staff. “And certainly a quick response force, with air and ground capabilities, has to be an important part of those resources.”

Friday, 11 January 2013

  • Guns and assault rifles examined.

     I have been a special operator in the military - and a municipal as well as federal law enforcement officer. The biggest "gun nuts" in the nation are cops and I know of none of them who are in favor of taking people guns away - in fact - they would then become criminals themselves when they HIDE their personal assault weapons!! The problem isn't GUNS! Too many  - or too few - whatever the argument anyone cares to make. Guns are NEVER going away - not in this country- neither the military nor the police are in favor of it despite what your anonymous "generals" might say. Oh - by the way - generals have ARMED guards when they travel - just like diplomats.

    Our perception of danger is easily distorted by rare events. Is gun violence increasing in the United States? No. But it certainly seems to be when one recalls recent atrocities in Newtown and Aurora. In fact, the overall rate of violent crime has fallen by 22 percent in the past decade (and 18 percent in the past five years). That is in spite of 10's of millions of new assault rifles, high capacity magazines and concealed carry permits.

    The correlation between guns and violence in the United States is far from straightforward. Thirty percent of urban households have at least one firearm. This figure increases to 42 percent in the suburbs and 60 percent in the countryside. As one moves away from cities, therefore, the rate of gun ownership doubles. And yet gun violence is primarily a problem in cities.  Just look at Chicago the toughest gun laws on the books and yet- 5000 murders since 2000. Compare that to 2000 US  KIA in Afghanistan. Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said recently that only about 300 of the 7,000 guns Chicago police have pulled off the street this year would be classified as assault weapons.

    Seventy mass shootings have occurred in the U.S. since 1982, leaving 543 dead. These crimes were horrific, but 564,452 other homicides took place in the U.S. during the same period. Mass shootings scarcely represent 0.1 percent of all murders. When talking about the problem of guns in our society, it is easy to lose sight of the worst violence and to become fixated on symbols of violence.

    Of course, it is important to think about the problem of gun violence in the context of other risks. For instance, it is estimated that 100,000 Americans die each year because doctors and nurses fail to wash their hands properly. Measured in bodies, therefore, the problem of hand washing in hospitals is worse than the problem of guns, even if we include accidents and suicides.

  • Victim opposed to ban on weapons

    http://www.komonews.com/news/local/-Shooting-victim-Tougher-gun-control-not-the-answer-186392431.html?tab=video&c=y

Saturday, 05 January 2013

  • Hammers kill more people than assault rifles

    FBI numbers from 2005 to 2011 indicate the number of murders by hammers and clubs consistently exceeds the number of murders committed with a rifle. 

    Think about it: In 2005, the number of murders committed with a rifle was 445, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 605. In 2006, the number of murders committed with a rifle was 438, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 618. And so the list goes, with the actual numbers changing somewhat from year to year, yet the fact that more people are killed with blunt objects each year remains constant.

    For example, in 2011there was 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs. 

    The FBI’s annual reports consistently show more lives are taken each year with blunt objects than are taken with all categories of rifle’s.

    Another interesting fact: According to the FBI, nearly twice as many people are killed by fists each year than are killed by murderers who use rifles.

    The bottom line: A rifle ban is as illogical as it is unconstitutional. We face far greater danger from individuals armed with carpenters' tools and a caveman's stick. 

Tuesday, 25 December 2012

  • On Firearms ans how to mitigate mass shootings

    When Adam Lanza, after killing 20 children and 6 adults with a stolen weapon, was confronted by armed police at Sandy Hook Elementary he committed suicide. At a theater in Littleton Colorado James Holmes, after killing 12 people and wounding 59, stopped shooting and surrendered when armed police officers confronted him. On Dec 12th in Clackamas Oregon John Roberts, after killing two people with a stolen rifle, saw an armed citizen with a concealed carry permit pointing a weapon at him he committed suicide. On December 5, 2007 at a department store in Omaha, Robert Hawkins killed nine people and wounded four, when confronted by a legally armed citizen with a concealed weapon permit he committed suicide.  When Major Hasan killed 13 and wounded 29 at Ft Hood Texas he was shot and stopped by armed police officers. In 1999 Klebold and Harris murdered 12 students,one teacher and injured 21 additional students. They both committed suicide when confronted by armed police. On 22 July 2011, Anders Brevik, dressed asa police officer killed 77, he only stopped when confronted by armed police. The average number of people shot in a mass shooting event when the shooter is stopped by law enforcement is 14. The average number of people shot in a mass shooting event when the shooter is stopped by civilians is 2.5. The reason is simple. The armed civilians are there when it started.

    Homicide rates are the lowest they have been since the early 1960's according to the DOJ: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf. In fact, removal of the semi-auto rifle restrictions did not increase the murder rate. We have a Second Amendment. Currently, Government Employees are allowed to use all kinds of weapons, including grenades, explosives, machine guns, high capacity pistols, short barrel rifles and shotguns, etc. Nowhere in the 2nd does it say that only the Government is allowed to be armed. You REALLY don't want live in a country where the political power is armed, and the voters are jailed for being armed. In the final analysis there is no statistical or logical reason to restrict gun ownership of law-abiding US citizens, UNLESS your intent it to rule them by force instead of by ballot.

Captric

  • Visit Captric's Xanga Site
    • Member Since: 9/16/2009

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

Groups

[no groups]